Nasty Art: Fleshtones
|
||||

Description: Is it porn or is it art? Nasty Art: Fleshtones delves into the erotic masterpieces of Irvin Bomb to find the answer. Artist Irvin Bomb strips porn starlets bare and captures their lust on canvas. Every curve, every nook and cranny is painstakingly reproduced in these hand-painted works. The results are nothing less than X-rated genius. Now go behind the scenes and discover the method to Bomb's carnal madness. Get up close and personal with your favorite adult starlets as they're immortalized by Bomb's lurid brush.
Performers | Director | Studio | Category | Duration (approximate) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hustler |
|
130 minutes | |||
Date Added: | |||||
06/28/2004 | |||||
Production Year: | |||||
2003 | |||||
Format: | |||||
DVD |
Member Reviews (0) Write a Review
Industry Reviews (1)
Reviewed by Domina (SGPC) 05/17/05 | Source: AdultDVDTalk | |
Nasty Art: Fleshtones Review by Domina Is it porn or is it art? Well, it certainly isn't art. NASTY ART: FLESHTONES, is pseudo-documentary of Irvin Bomb's art, a painter who creates art from porn. His paintings are not bad, but the film about his work really is. The set-up is, girls come to visit Irvin to get their pornographic portraits done. Supposedly these women are somebody's favorite porn starslets, but whose, I'm not sure, as they are barely average in both looks and performance. In fact their performance is very amateur, and not in a good way. These girls (in lesbian couples) perform for the camera and Irvin's easel. The sex is blah, the camerawork awkward and amateur, and worst of all the lighting is abrasive. I can actually count the pimples on some of the girl's asses. Sorry to be so harsh, but I'm sick of crappy porn that hails itself as art, when it isn't even good for porn standards. A real let down by a studio (Hustler) that I expect better quality. Other reviews by Domina Email Me |