Kim Kardashian, Superstar

2633 (633)
Rent Kim Kardashian, Superstar DVD
Enlarge Front Front   Enlarge Back Back
Performers Director Studio Category Duration (approximate)
  Vivid
Tags
41 minutes
Date Added:
03/10/2024
Production Year:
2003
Format:
DVD

Member Reviews (10) Write a Review

Reviewed by   12/23/13
Ah, now I see what all the hoopla is about: 1hr & 22 minutes featuring Kim & Ray J on vacation in various exotic locales, and 15 minutes dedicated to hardcore sex with minimal lighting. Had the entire film fared as well as the last 15 minutes, this sex tape would have been enjoyable. Sidenote: my version ran 96 minutes in length. Can only recommend as a novelty/curiosity.
Reviewed by   05/14/09
FASTEST RETURN EVER!!!! this dvd is shit!!!! poor camera, poor lighting and ray j!! What more can u not ask for!!only fools and suckers would spend 39.95 on this crap dvd. Kim beautiful too bad ray j spends more time pointing the camera on himself though and dont get me started on the poor sex (only one scene by the way) AGGHHHHH!!!!!! Only rent if your a Ray J fan.
Reviewed by   04/01/09
This Piece Of Shit Film was a fuckin joke. i am so glad that I rented it instead of buyin it, cause i would have fuckin tried to rip this shit into shreds. Ray J sucks jus like his sister Brandy, And Kim, aaaugh..........
Reviewed by   05/27/08
Ugh. If you know who and/or give a fuck about Kim Kardashian or Ray J, you might enjoy this. Kim is a beautiful woman, but I have no idea what she is actually famous for and I'm guessing Ray J is a rapper. Also, there is not much fucking in this film. I was so bored by the film I didn't even watch all of the last scene (which was an actual sex scene.)
Reviewed by   03/06/08
This isn't even a porno movie. If you want to be a porn actress, then you have to really sick duck, and fuck, not pretend. Obviously this was a set up to stir some interest in her tv show, but its stupid. About as revealing and titilating as a Maxim spread.
Reviewed by   01/27/08
i thought this was a decent film, granted i rented it, but it was okay, it was what i expected it to be.. but i didn't expect the film editors to milk so much time out of what probably was 10min of film into less than an hour, replay footage and different ways and sounds..

whether it works better with the edit or not .. i just loved seeing Kim.. i wish i could have seen as it was shot.. I think she got self conscious with all the lights on and turned them all down.. you can catch how its out of order.. and i think she kept the bra on because , again, she was probably self aware that her tits may puddle and hang down to the sides.. so to keep the shape.. the bra stayed on..

but this film as nice to check out.. even if its just once.
Reviewed by   12/02/07
DONT WASTE YOUR TIME AND MONEY!!! Kim is a beautiful woman, not very exciting in bed, but beautiful. As far as the guy...we were laughing at him the whole time! For crying out loud, take a drink of water Mr. Dry mouth and stop chomping the gum! Who gives a crap what a flash in the pan like YOU has to say? What an attention starved idiot!!! LOL!!! Everybody just wants to see and hear Kim even though it seemed that she was bored. Pretty sad that they had to loop and reverse footage. This has GOT to be THE worst celeb porn ever made (even worse than Bret and Pam's)!
Reviewed by   10/29/07
A total waste of time and money. Other reviewers say they are glad they "did not waste money," but they actually did - indirectly that is. I pity the fools who actually paid full price to acquire the movie.
Reviewed by   07/09/07
IN SHORT THIS DVD IS A PIECE OF TRASH . YOU CANT SEE ANYTHING EXCEPT THAT RAY J HAS SOME SERIOUS SAUSAGE I MEAN AT LEAST PARIS TOOK HER TOP OFF IM GLAD I RENTED THIS ONE. IM NOT SAD TO RETURN IT
Reviewed by   05/02/07
I am SO glad I didn't plunk money on this!

The Adult DVD Talk review said it all but to add on to that, you only saw Kim's breasts a few times and she didn't FULLY take her top off so you didn't get the entire curvature. You did see KK perform oral on Ray J from his POV on the camera (and for those interested, he does have a long cock). But as for the sex, though there were a couple of dark penetration shots, it was basically Ray J behind Kim as you saw his butt thrust as he is banging her from behind (assuming he is going to her pussy). She keeps her bikini top on throughout though!

There were a lot of dark scenes (granted, I am not expecting celebs to be videographers but something could have been done to "brighten up" those scenes.

For those curious, you could check this video out, but as far as celebs go....stick with her BFF, Paris Hilton.

Industry Reviews (1)

Reviewed by   03/22/07 Source: AdultDVDTalk

After all the hype I finally had the opportunity to view the DVD yesterday. And I have to say that I'm so incredibly glad I didn't bother plunking down my $49.95 CAD for the DVD.

I think some of us have this natural curiosity to take a look a celebs fucking. No matter how famous they were or are. Forgetting that in most cases the videography is usually piss poor.

Now, was this DVD was a publicity stunt? And how did it magically make it into the hands of Steve Hirsch (VIVID pres)? Hmmmm...How convenient. I guess it really doesn't matter in the end.

You see evidence of some "experienced" video directing during and post-production work. And being that it did spend some time in post-production. Why didn't they do something about the light right there? Any amateur digital photographers out there hear of a feature called "fill-lighting" (among many other typical lighting fixes)? Yet, in taping the sex, they make typical amateur filming mistakes with light. And release it as is. More less.

In many instances, the camera is positioned at the headboard of the bed. Or maybe the night table right next to it. So that KK's face was only inches from the camera. No end table light was turned on. Which would have helped greatly. And the only light sources are behind Ray-J.

As soon as he moves up and forward to allgedly fuck KK from behind he blocks out all the available light for the shot. Which was the light in the hall in the hotel room. So during more than a quarter of this DVD you are looking at a dark screen. Possibly 50% of this 41 minute feature. With only some outdoor scenes and non-sex indoor video with ample lighting.

Was this entire production staged? Hmmm...

You do see a little action. KK giving Ray-J quick BJs. You see her boobs and her pussy (though, her labia were always in hiding). You see suggestive shots where you assume she's being penetrated vaginally.

And regarding celeb sex tapes in general. What I will never understand is why they usually end up using incredibly cheapass camcorders. Why?? With all their millions made and spent I would have expected near prestine video quality. Lighting and camera jiggling problems aside. Why not spend $1500 on a HD camcorder? Or even $1000 on a non-HD camcorder? Even if they aren't techies...These guys/gals drop tens of thousands on casual shopping sprees...for clothing, food...etc.

The Janine/Vince Neil sex tape used a camcorder that for some odd reason couldn't AF (auto focus) fast enough. Maybe it had been banged around (no pun intended there). So at times when the action is getting good you'd miss a second or two. Though, to this tape's credit they did position themselves so that you could see the action clearly. Janine was thinking. Helps to have a porn "actress" on set. This tape didn't look staged (for publicity).

Any how, if you're into celeb sex tapes, and can overlook the moments of darkness, than maybe it's worth a look. A "guilty pleasure". But to spend your coin?? Fugatabuttit!!! Go buy some Manuel Ferrara!! :)